US Sanctions and Their Impact on Arctic LNG 2 Shipments

With the imminent initiation of LNG volumes from Arctic LNG 2 and the specter of US sanctions, Calypso Commodities provides an analytical forecast for the project’s 2024 outlook. The study delves into the repercussions for shipping duration and portfolio profitability, based on the constrained shipping options and the particularities of the project’s location along the Northeast Passage.

Shipping from Arctic LNG 2 under constraints

The graphic illustrates projected shifts in LNG shipping for Arctic LNG 2 in 2024 due to potential sanctions and route choices. It compares the effects of various passage options—Northeast Passage and Suez—on shipping distances, times, and costs for cargos headed to Europe and Asia.

Arctic LNG 2 would boost Russian LNG capacities to over 50 MTPA

Graphic Content Warning

While the share of Russian pipeline gas in Europe dropped to historic lows, LNG exports to Europe are rising. The most recent US sanctions against the Arctic LNG 2 project, will massively obstruct the project’s ramp-up.

Connect on LinkedIn
Launch X-LNG

Key Takeaways

This realignment hinges on the operational uncertainty of the Northeast Passage. The modeling, premised on the ramp-up and commissioning of 120 Arctic LNG 2 cargos, projects a substantial engagement of additional shipping vessels due to sanctions and limited vessel availability. The analysis also shows a significant impact on cargos directed to Asia via the Northeast Passage, effecting portfolio P&L by 16%. Conversely, the closure of the passage could reroute volumes back to Europe, whereas forced redirection through the Suez Canal would drastically cut P&L by 66%, highlighting the delicate balance of maritime logistics in the LNG industry.

US Sanctions and Their Impact on Arctic LNG 2 Shipments

With the imminent initiation of LNG volumes from Arctic LNG 2 and the specter of US sanctions, Calypso Commodities provides an analytical forecast for the project’s 2024 outlook. The study delves into the repercussions for shipping duration and portfolio profitability, based on the constrained shipping options and the particularities of the project’s location along the Northeast Passage.

Shipping from Arctic LNG 2 under constraints

The graphic illustrates projected shifts in LNG shipping for Arctic LNG 2 in 2024 due to potential sanctions and route choices. It compares the effects of various passage options—Northeast Passage and Suez—on shipping distances, times, and costs for cargos headed to Europe and Asia.

Arctic LNG 2 would boost Russian LNG capacities to over 50 MTPA

Graphic Content Warning

While the share of Russian pipeline gas in Europe dropped to historic lows, LNG exports to Europe are rising. The most recent US sanctions against the Arctic LNG 2 project, will massively obstruct the project’s ramp-up.

Connect on LinkedIn
Launch X-LNG

Key Takeaways

This realignment hinges on the operational uncertainty of the Northeast Passage. The modeling, premised on the ramp-up and commissioning of 120 Arctic LNG 2 cargos, projects a substantial engagement of additional shipping vessels due to sanctions and limited vessel availability. The analysis also shows a significant impact on cargos directed to Asia via the Northeast Passage, effecting portfolio P&L by 16%. Conversely, the closure of the passage could reroute volumes back to Europe, whereas forced redirection through the Suez Canal would drastically cut P&L by 66%, highlighting the delicate balance of maritime logistics in the LNG industry.

Sign up & Request Access

Please enter your name as well as your business e-mail address to sign-up for X-LNG access.

Already have an account? Log In
Log in & Launch X-LNG
Thank you for your registration!
Our team will review your details and reach about regarding your access to X-LNG.
Return to website
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.